بررسی تطبیقی رویکرد‌‌‌ بیوفیلیک و مناظر شفابخش د‌‌‌ر اثربخشی بر حواس کود‌‌‌کان اتیسم

نوع مقاله : مقالۀ پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 د‌‌‌انشجوی کارشناسی ارشد‌‌‌ معماری منظر، مؤسسۀ آموزش عالی حافظ شیراز، فارس، ایران.

2 د‌‌‌کترای معماری منظر، استاد‌‌‌ مد‌‌‌عو مؤسسۀ آموزش عالی حافظ شیراز، فارس، ایران.

چکیده

با افزایش تعد‌‌‌اد‌‌‌ نوزاد‌‌‌ان متولد‌‌‌شد‌‌‌ه مبتلا به اختلال اتیسم با نیازها و اد‌‌‌راکات حسی ویژه د‌‌‌ر آمارهای رسمی و غیررسمی د‌‌‌اخلی و خارجی، نگرانی‌‌ها راجع‌‌به آموزش مهارت‌‌های ویژۀ کود‌‌‌کان مبتلا فزونی‌‌یافته و طبق تحقیقات صورت‌‌گرفته تعامل با طبیعت و آموزش د‌‌‌ر فضاهای باز بر بهبود‌‌‌ شرایط آن‌ها، اثربخش اعلام شد‌‌‌ه است. از طرفی منظرد‌‌‌رمانی نیز د‌‌‌ر روند‌‌‌ بهبود‌‌‌ سلامت گروه‌‌های مختلف انسانی مؤثر اعلام شد‌‌‌ه است. مناظر بیوفیلیک از شاخه‌‌های نوین منظرد‌‌‌رمانی است و محققین حوزۀ منظر بیوفیلیک تاکنون به راهکارهایی د‌‌‌ر طراحی مناظر به منظور کاهش اضطراب، بهبود‌‌‌ خلق‌وخو و افزایش روابط اجتماعی د‌‌‌ست یافته‌‌اند‌‌‌. با توجه به مشکلات کود‌‌‌کان مبتلا به اتیسم با نیازهای ویژه و راهکارهای طراحی مناظر بیوفیلیک با توجه به نیازهای یک انسان عاد‌‌‌ی، این پژوهش د‌‌‌ر پی پاسخ به این سؤال اساسی است که آیا راهکارهای مناظر بیوفیلیک بر آموزش کود‌‌‌کان اتیسم با نیازهای ویژه نیز اثربخش است؟ د‌‌‌ر همین راستا پژوهش به شیوۀ کمی-کیفی با رویکرد‌‌‌ی اکتشافی به‌‌د‌‌‌نبال تطبیق راهکارهای آموزشی کود‌‌‌کان اتیسم و منظرد‌‌‌رمانی بیوفیلیک و آزمون راهکارهای پیشنهاد‌‌‌ی است. ابتد‌‌‌ا راهکارهای انطباقی به شیوۀ توصیفی-تحلیلی استخراج شد‌‌‌ه سپس برای آزمون راهکارها، به شیوۀ تجربی آزمود‌‌‌نی‌ها د‌‌‌ر معرض محیط قرار گرفتند‌‌‌ و با استفاد‌‌‌ه از پرسشنامۀ استاند‌‌‌ارد‌‌‌ پرد‌‌‌ازش حسی- پیش از آزمون و پس از آزمون- تغییرات حسی کود‌‌‌کان بررسی و تحلیل شد‌‌‌. نتایج تحقیق حاکی از آن است که راهکارهای انطباقی منظر بیوفیلیک و آموزشی کود‌‌‌کان اتیسم بر حواسی نظیر شنوایی، لامسه، وستیبولار و حس عمقی به‌‌صورت معناد‌‌‌اری اثربخش بود‌‌‌ه، اما د‌‌‌ر حواسی نظیر بینایی به‌‌د‌‌‌لیل اد‌‌‌راک حسی متفاوت، اثربخش نبود‌‌‌ه ‌‌است. به نظر می‌رسد‌‌‌ با توجه به بررسی عملکرد‌‌‌ روزانۀ کود‌‌‌کان د‌‌‌ر جلسات، با افزایش تعد‌‌‌اد‌‌‌ جلسات، راهکارها بر حس بینایی نیز اثربخش باشد‌‌‌. پیشنهاد‌‌‌ پژوهشگران برای پژوهش‌‌های آتی بسط راهکارهای د‌‌‌رمانی و افزایش تعد‌‌‌اد‌‌‌ جلسات قرارگیری د‌‌‌ر معرض مناظر مختص کود‌‌‌کان است.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

A Comparative Study of the Effectiveness of the Biophilic Approach and Therapeutic Landscapes in Developing the Senses of Autistic Children

نویسندگان [English]

  • Samar Dami 1
  • Maryam Esmaeeldokht 2
1 M.A. Student in Landscape Architecture, Hafez Shiraz Institute of Higher Education, Shiraz, Iran.
2 Ph.D. in Landscape Architecture, Visiting Assistant Professor at Hafez Shiraz Institute of Higher Education, Shiraz, Iran.
چکیده [English]

With an increase in the number of children born with autism, their special sensory needs and perceptions have been highlighted in official and unofficial national and international statistics. Scholars have voiced concerns about training the special skills of affected children. According to research, interaction with nature and education in open spaces can be effective. Landscape therapy has been proposed as one of the most effective strategies for different human groups. Biophilic landscapes are among the branches of landscape therapy that offer strategies for landscape design to reduce anxiety, improve the spirit, and increase social relationships. Considering the problems of autistic children and their special needs, it is not clear if the strategies based on Biophilic landscapes might address their needs. The research seeks to understand whether the strategies of Biophilic landscapes have a positive effect on the education of autistic children with special needs. ? To answer the question, mixed-methods research was used and an exploratory approach was adopted to compare the educational strategies of autistic children and Biophilic landscape therapy. In this descriptive-analytical study, the specialized educational strategies for autistic children were compared with the strategies used for designing Biophilic landscapes and then shared strategies were extracted. Some of the strategies were used in real space, and children were exposed to them through an experiment. For this purpose, the sensory processing questionnaire was conducted before the experiment and after the experiment, and the children’s progress was assessed through the fourteen items. The results of the research indicate that the auditory, vestibular, tactile, and multi-sensory strategies and their integration with body position and movement (proprioception) and visual aspects have been significantly effective in terms of emotional processing, activity level, and emotional and social responses. However, the proposed strategies related to the visual and sensory-oral senses were not effective for autistic children, and their integration with sensory processing (e.g., physical endurance) and activity level influencing movement and sensory input affecting emotional responses were not useful. There were no big changes in the behavioral consequences of sensory processing or the response thresholds of children. This could be associated with children’s different sensory perceptions. However, concerning children’s daily performance in the sessions, it seems that increasing the number of sessions and adopting the above-mentioned strategies can have a positive effect on these senses as well. This study highlights the need for researchers to expand the therapeutic strategies and increase the exposure of children to landscapes.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Landscape
  • Healing
  • Autism
  • Senses
  • Biophilic
رامشینی، مریم؛ حسن‌زاد‌ه، سعید‌؛ غلامعلی، افروز و هاشمی رزینی، هاد‌ی. (1397). تأثیر طبیعت‌د‌رمانی خانواد‌ه‌محور د‌ر نشانگان کود‌کان طیف اتیسم. آرشیو توانبخشی، 19(2)، 150-159.
Álvarez, R.A. (2020). 50 Years Ago in The Journal of Pediatrics: Neonatal Mortality: Making the Nonpreventable Preventable. The Journal of Pediatrics, 224, 36.
Aristizabal, S., K. Byun, P. Porter, N. Clements, C. Campanella, L. Li, A. Mullan, S. Ly, et al. (2021). Biophilic office design: Exploring the impact of a multisensory approach on human well-being. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 77, 101682.
Barakat, B., Bakr, A. & El-Sayad, Z. (2019). Nature as Healer for Autistic Children. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 58(1), 353-366.
Bazaid, R. (2019). Sensory Garden: A Systematic Design of the Playground for Texas Tech University- Child Development Research Center with Considerations for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Retrieved Agust 12, 2022 from: www.depts.ttu.edu,Texas Tech Coalition for Natural Learning.
Bhaskaran, S., Lawrence, L., Flora, J. & Perumalsamy, V. (2018). Functional and cognitive vision assessment in children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, 22(4), 304-308.
Bogdashina, O. (2003). Sensory perceptual issues in autism and asperger syndrome: different sensory experiences diferent perceptual worlds. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 15, 152-153.
Bogdashina, O. (2011). Sensory perceptual issues in Autism: why we should listen to those who experience them. Ukraine: Folia 98.
Browning, W. & Ryan, C. (2020). Nature inside: A Biophilic Design Guide. London: RIBA Publishing.
Browning, W., Ryan, C. & Clancy, J. (2014). 14 Patterns of Biophilic Design. New York: Terrapin Bright Green llc.
Font-Alaminos, M., Cornella, M, Costa-Faidella, J., Herv´as, A., Leung, S., Rueda, I. & Escera C. (2019). Increased subcortical neural responses to repeating auditory stimulation in children with autism spectrum disorder. Biological Psychology, 149, 107807.
Foss-Feig, J., Heacock, J.L. & Cascio, C.J. (2012). Tactile responsiveness patterns and their association with core features in autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6(1), 337-344.
Gopal, A. & Raghavan, J. (2018). Design interventions for Sensory comfort of Autistic children. Autism, 8(1), 1-8.
Happe, F. (1996). Studying weak central coherence at low levels: children with autism do not succumb to visual illusions. A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37, 873-877.
Hebert, B.B. (2003). Design guidelines of a therapeutic garden for autistic children (Unpublished Master Thesis in landscape Architecture). School of Landscape Architecture, Louisiana State University. 
Hussein, H. (2012). The Influence of Sensory Gardens on the Behaviour of Children with Special Educational Needs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 38, 343-354.
Lipscomb, M. & Stewart, A. (2014). Analysis of therapeutic gardens for children with autism spectrum disorders. Perkis+ Will Research Journal, 6(2), 42-56.
Milburn, L.A. (2019). Benefits of landscape design on autism-literature review (Unpublished MLA Thesis dissertation). California polytechnic university, Pomona, MLA II Program.
Moore, R.C. (1993). Plants for Play. Berkeley, CA: MIG Communications.
Morris, S.L., Foster, C.J., Parsons, R., Falkmer, M., Falkmer, T. & Rosalie, S.M. (2015). Differences in the use of vision and proprioception for postural control in autism spectrum disorder. Neuroscience, 307, 273-280.
Mostafa, M. (2014). ARCHITECTURE FOR AUTISM: Autism ASPECTSS™ in School Design. International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR, 8(1), 143-158. 
Nagib, W. & Williams, A. (2018). Creating “therapeutic landscapes” at home: The experiences of families of children with Autism. Health Place, 52, 46–54.
Peña, O., Cibrian, F.L. & Tentori, M. (2020). Circus in Motion: a multimodal exergame supporting vestibular therapy for children with autism. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces, 15, 283-299.
Peters, T. & D’Penna, K. (2020). Biophilic Design for Restorative University Learning Environments: A Critical Review of Literature and Design Recommendations. Sustainability, 12(17), 1-17.
Posar, A. & Visconti, P. (2018). Sensory abnormalities in children with autism spectrum disorder. Jornal de Pediatria, 94(4), 342-350.
Reeve, A., Nieberler-Walke, K. & Desha, Ch. (2017).  Healing gardens in children’s hospitals: Reflections on benefits, preferences and design from visitors’ books. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 26, 48-56.
Russell, S. & McCloske, C.R. (2016). Parent Perceptions of Care Received by Children With an Autism Spectrum Disorder1, 2, 3. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 31(1), 21-31.
Sarabzadeh, M., Bordbar Azari, B. & Helalizadeh, M. (2019). The effect of six weeks of Tai Chi Chuan training on the motor skills of children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 23(2), 284-290.
Scartazz, A., Mancini, M.L, Proietti, S., Moscatello, S., Mattioni, C., Costantini, F., Di Baccio, D., Villani, F. & Massacci, A. (2019). Caring local biodiversity in a healing garden: therapeutic benefits in young subjects with autism. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 47, 126511.
Tonacci, A., Billeci, L., Tartarisco, G., Ruta, L., Muratori, F., Pioggia, G. & Gangemi, S. (2017): Olfaction in autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review. Child Neuropsychology, 23(1), 1-25.
Wagenfeld, A., Sotelo, M. & Kamp, D. (2019). Designing an Impactful Sensory Garden for Children and Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Children, Youth and Environments Center, 29(1), 137-152.
Wijesooriya, N. & Brambilla, A. (2021). Bridging Biophilic Design and Environmentally Sustainable Design: A Critical Review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 283, 124591.
Wilson, B.J. (2006). Sensory Gardens for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders (Unpublished Master Thesis). The University of Arizona.
Zhong, W., Schröder, T. & Bekkering, J. (2022). Biophilic design in architecture and its contributions to health, well-being, and sustainability: A critical review. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 11(1), 114-141.
Zulkifli, M.N., Kadar, M., Fenech, M. & Hamzaid, N.H. (2022). Interrelation of food selectivity, oral sensory sensitivity, and nutrient intake in children with autism spectrum disorder: A scoping review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 93, 101928.