Comparison of Two Paradigms of the Sacred Landscape in Islamic and Christian City (Case Study: Holy Shrine of Imam Reza in Mashhad and the Duomo Cathedral in Milan)

Document Type : Original Research Article

Authors

1 University of Tehran, Iran.

2 Ph. D Candidate in Urban Landscape, Nazar Laboratory, Iran/ Paris 8 University, France.

Abstract

By studying the history of the diversity of urbanism attitudes in the world, it is becoming evident to us that religions have always had a drastic influence on the form, development, and geometry of the city. The influence of religions on the development of the cities is derived from the respect which all divine religions consider for holy places. The construction of a sacred place in an area has always given value to the surrounding fabric. Furthermore, it centralizes urban and other affiliate activities in the environs; therefore, the structure of the city has been gradually formed around the sacred place. The type of outlook to the sacred place in the two religions of Islam and Christianity is generally different, and this attitude towards the sacred place landscape is also crystallized. So, with an analytical and historical comparisons between Islamic and Christian cities and assess landscape constituent of the sacred place, the different attitudes towards the holy place can be seen.
In this qualitative study, according to the theorists' point of view about city structure, the position of sacred places in the Islamic and the Christian cities has been investigated. Then a comparative study conducted between two case pilgrimage sites. the findings evidently prove that the landscape identity of the holy places in the Islamic city is organically connected to the peripheral neighborhood and the surrounding area. In fact, sacred place is located in the heart of environ spaces as a focal place which could bring together communication of pilgrims and citizens in term of various pilgrimage did and usual activities. However, in Christianity, the holy place has a dominated architecture which represents Christ cross in geometry and also has semantic and formic independent respect to its adjacent. The lack of objective-subjective relations with nearby neighborhoods leads to separation of the holy place and usual urban activity. The origin of this contention appears in the analogy of sacred places in both Islamic and Christian cities.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

• Abarghouei Fard, H., Saboonchi, P. & Farzin, A.A. (2018).An Investigation into the Role of Ritual Landscapes in the Identity of Iranian Cities. Bagh-e Nazar, 15 (65), 5-12. DOI: 10.22034/BAGH.2018.74072.
• Bammate, N. (2014). Cités d'islam. Translated by Halimi, M.H. & Eslambolchi, M. Tehran: Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance publications. (Original work published in 1987).
• Benevolo, L. (2015). The history of the city. Translated by Movahhed, P. Tehran : Markaz-e nashr-e daneshgahi. (Original work published in 1980).
• Dabaghian, F. (2017). Dwelling Structure and the Neighbourhood Order of the European During the Medieval period .Case studies: Cities like Florence, Venice, Siena and Lyon. Journal of Art and Civilization of the Orient. 4 (14), 41-54.
• Etezadi, L. (1998). Naghsh-e Masjed dar Shakhtar-e Shahr-ha-ye Mosalman neshin [The role of the mosque in the structure of Muslim cities].
Soffeh, 8 (26), 8-21.
• Gentile, C., & Canali, F. (2018). Continuous Monitoring the Cathedral of Milan: Design, Installation and Preliminary Results. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Proceedings, 2 (8), 467.
• Latifi, G., Safari Chabok, N. (2013). Regeneration of neighborhood new urbanism principles times in Islamic Iranian cities. Motaleate Shahri Journal of urban studies. 2 (8), 3-12.
• Mansouri, S. A. (2007). Spatial organization of Iranian city in tow periods: before and after Islam Based on testimonies of evaluations of the City of Kerman. Bagh- e Nazar, 4 (7), 50-60.
• Mirza Kochak Khoshnevis, A. & Zargary, A. (2017). Barresi-ye tafavot-e sakhtari-ye anasor-e shahri dar shahr-ha-ye eslami va masihi (Moghayese-ye tatbighi beyn-e anasor-e memary-e shahri dar shahr-ha-ye sonnati-ye Irani va ghoron-e vosta-ye oropaei [A Study on the Structural Difference between Urban Elements in Islamic and Christian Cities (Comparative Comparison between Urban Architecture Elements in Traditional Iranian and European Middle Ages cities)]. International Conference on Modern Studies in Civil Engineering, Architecture and Urbanism with the Islamic Iran Approach, Mashhad: Sadjad University of Technology. Available from: https://www.civilica.com/Paper-
CONFCA01-CONFCA01_106. (Accessed 15 january 2019).
• Modarres Razavi, M., Fayyaz, A., Moayyedi, A., Molavi, A. &
Farrokh, M. (2009). Mashhad dar Aghaz-e Gharn-e 14 Khorshidi: Mashhor be Gozaresh-e Maktab-e Shahpoor [Mashhad at the beginning of the
fourteen century, Known as Maktab-e Shahpoor report]. Mashhad: Ahang-e Ghalam Publication.
• Morris, A. E. J. (2015). History of urban form before the industrial revolution. Translated by Rezazadeh, M. Tehran: Iran University of
Science & Technology. (Original work published in 1979).
• Norberg-Schulz, C. (2013). Architecture Presence, Language and Place. Translated by Ahmadian, S.A. Tehran: Niloofar Publication.
(Original work published in 2000).
• Papoli Yazdi, M. H. & Rajabi Sanajerdi, H. (2010). The theory of urban and surrounding. Tehran: SAMT Publication.
• Sheykhi, M. (2003). Neighbourhood Structure of the Past Islamic Cities. social sciences, 10 (22), 39-68.
MANZAR, the Scientific Journal of landscape
Volume 11, Issue 48
October 2019
Pages 14-21

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics