Woonerf; A Study of Urban Landscape Components on Living Streets

Document Type : Review

Authors

1 assistant professor tabriz islamic art university

2 Shahid Beheshti university

Abstract

In the field of pedestrian-orientation, the notion of shared space has been proposed as a human-centered approach to the designing of contemporary urban streets with the aim of integration of vehicles and people. The woonerf phenomenon, which can literally be translated as ‘living yard’, is equivalent to traffic-calming or home zones aimed at realizing shared space on the scale of residential neighborhoods. Aiming to create safe and vital neighborhoods and set a speed limit for passing vehicles in the region, woonerf increases the symbiotic potential of personal vehicles and pedestrians; it gives pedestrians the right of way, allows for their free movement, especially in the case of the elderly and those with physical disabilities, and provides a safe playing area for children in the neighborhood. As part of the urban landscape on the neighborhood scale, woonerf consists of physical-functional, aesthetic and semantic-spatial aspects of landscape. It is achieved through the combination of natural and human-made environments based on human activities and it can provide delightful emotional, perceptual and cognitive experiences for local residents by adjusting the ergonomic, personal, social and cultural needs of people in a special neighborhood by recourse to “form, function and meaning” simultaneously. The sum total of perceptual, formal and symbolic levels in an aesthetic experience centered on humans and pedestrians leads to aesthetic pleasure. Finally, the woonerf urban landscape as an objective-subjective phenomenon will metaphorically remind inhabitants of the living street by enhancing vitality, increasing social interaction and inducing a sense of place in integrated spaces for pedestrians, bicycles and motor vehicles as pedestrian-oriented shared space for a democratic and livable neighborhood.

Keywords

References

Alexander, Ch. (2014). The City is Not a Tree, translated by Farnaz Farshad and Shamin Gharraq. Tehran: Armanshahr.
Appleyard, D. (1980). Livable Streets. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Biddulph, M. (2012). Street Design and Street Use: Comparing Traffic Calmed and Home Zone Streets. Journal of Urban Design, 17:2: 213-232.
Chasan, P. (ND). Traffic-Restricted Streets: Woonerfs and Transit Malls. University of Washington/Open Space Seattle 2100.
Collarte, N. (2012). The Woonerf Concept. Rethinking a Residential Street in Somerville. Tufts University.
Fazaeli, M.; Seddiqh, M. (2013). Urban Design of Streets: Patterns and Theories, Soroush Danesh, Tehran.
Gehl, J. (1987). Life between Buildings. New York: Van Nostrand.
Gharehbaglou, M.; Einifar, A.; Izadi, A.A. (2013). Children Interaction with Place in Outdoor Spaces of residential Complexes. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba, 18(2): 69-82.
Ghazipour, S. (2012). Woonerf: A New Paradigm of Urban Textile Rehabilitation in Iran (Case Study: Sangalj, Tehran), Islamic Art University of Tabriz: faculty of Architecture and Urban Development.
Gillies, A. (2009). Is Road There to share? Sharede space in an Austalian context. Bachelor of Planning, university of New South Wales.
Haghi, M.R.; Izadi; M.S.; Molavi, E. (2014). Evaluation and Comparison of Two Policies of Anatomy and Pedestrian Policies in Urban Centers, Case Study: Central Textures in Hamadan. Journal of Urban Studies, (13): 17-31.
Hamilton-Baillie, B. (2001). Home Zones - Reconciling People, Places and Transport. Study Tour of Denmark, Germany, Holland & Sweden. July to August 2000.
Hamilton-Baillie, B. (2005). Improving traffic behavior and safety through urban design. Civil Engineering. 158, May 2005: 39-47.
Hass-Klau, C. (1990). The Pedestrian and City Traffic. London: Belhaven Press.
Heydecker, B.G. & Robertson, S. (2009). Evaluation of Pedestrian Priority Zones in the European area: Report to the Korea Transport Institute KoTI, Centre for Transport Studies, University College London.
Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. London: Pimlico.
Karimi Moshaver, M.; Sajadzadeh, H.; Vahdat, S. (2016). Measurement of Readings Priority Landscape of Urban Spaces from the Standpoint of Citizens (Case Study: Urban Squares of the City of Hamadan). Journal of Bagh- E Nazar, 12(37): 3-14.
Kashanijoo, K.; Mofidi Shamariani, S.M. (2009). The Evolution of Theories related to Intra-urban Transport. Urban Identity Journal, 3 (4): 3-14.
Lusher, L., Seaman, M., Tsay, Sh.p. (2008). Streets to Live By: How Livable Street Design Can Bring Economic, Health and Quality-of-Life Benefits to New York City. Record URL:
Mahan, A. & Mansouri, S.A. (2017). The Study of “Landscape” Concept with an Emphasis on the Views of Authorities of Various Disciplines. Journal of Bagh- E Nazar, 14(47): 17-28
Mansoori, S.A. (2010). The Nature of the Urban Landscape: A Historical Analysis of the Concept of Urban Landscape in Iran. Journal of Manzar, 2 (9): 30-33.
Mathloch, J.L. (2000). Introduction to Landscape Design, Municipality of Tehran Urban Services Deputy Tehran Parks and Green Space organization, Tehran.
McBeath, Ch. (2009). Home Zones: Shared Streets in Halifax, Instructor: Grant, J., Advisor: Garnet, M.
Ministry of Transport. (1963). Traffic in towns: A study of the long term problems of traffic in urban areas. London: HMSO.
Moayyedi, M.; Alinezhad, M.; Navadi, H. (2012). Investigating the Role of Urban Landscape Components in Promoting Level of Safety in Urban Public Spaces (Case Study: Evin, Tehran). Social Security Studies, (35): 159-191.
Moeeni, S.M.M. (2006). Increasing the Walkability: A Step towards a More Humanistic City. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba, (27): 5-16.
Mohammadpour Zarandi, H.; Aminian, N. (2015). Evaluation of Tourism Sidewalks Recreation Potentials from the Perspective of Urban Sustainable Development (The Case of 15 Khordad Avenue, Tehran). IUESA, 3 (11):1-23.
Moudon, A. V. (1991). Public Street for Public Use. New York: Columbia University Press.
Nalmpantis, D.; Lampou, S.C.; Naniopoulos, A., (2017). The Concept of Woonerf Zone Applied in University Campuses: The Case of the Campus of the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. Transportation Research Procedia 24: 450–458.
Pakzad, J.; Saki, E. (2014). Environmental Aesthetic Experience. Journal of Honar-ha-ye Ziba, 19 (3): 5-14.
Pressman, N. (1987). The European Experience, In Vernez Moudon, Anne, Public Streets for Public Use, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York.
Rafieyan, M.; Sedighi, S.; Pour Mohammadi, M. (2011). The Feasibility of Improving Environmental Quality through the Pedestrianization of Urban Axes. Journal of urban regional studies and research, 11: 41-56.
Schepel, S. (2005). Woonerf Revisited: Delft as an Example, Childstreet 2005 Conference, Delft, 2005.
Taghvaee, S.H. (2012). Landscape Architecture: An Introduction to Theory and Meaning. Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University.
Van den Boomen, T. (2002). Wed met de regels! Het Nieuwe Woonerf [Away with the rules! The New Woonerf]. NCR Hamdelsblad, 5.
MANZAR, the Scientific Journal of landscape
Volume 10, Issue 43
August 2018
Pages 42-51

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics