Landscape Capacities in Realizing the Concept of Participation in Urban Projects

Document Type : Original Research Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. in Architecture, Department of Architecture, South Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor , Department of Architecture, University of Tehran, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, South branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

4 Associate Professor, Department of Urban planning, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran.

Abstract

In recent years, many projects have been implemented that, despite their potentials, have not left any noticeable impact on the tangible quality of the city and have not affected the way the citizens assess their habitat due to various reasons. The current disorganized urban landscapes lack the semantic and qualitative aspects despite the authorities’ efforts for implementing a large quantity of projects. This has led to people’s dissatisfaction since these projects are management-oriented projects that lack public participation. If the urban projects are considered as “landscape” projects, public participation might become more institutionalized. The landscape approach can also guarantee infrastructural participation in urban projects. Therefore, the main research question is, “what specific capacities are there in the landscape approach that makes it appropriate for realizing the concept of participation?” This study aims to investigate the theoretical relationship between the concept of landscape, as a concept related to the audience, and the concept of participation to increase the quality of urban projects and result in people’s satisfaction. In this qualitative research, first, the main concepts of the research (participation and landscape) are examined. The next step investigates the relationship between the concept of participation and landscape and the definition of appropriate participation in landscape projects, using analogy and logical reasoning. The results showed that in landscape definitions, the audience’s perception is the most significant issue. Therefore, the landscape definition is basically a bottom-up definition and is configured based on the audience’s point of view. This view explains the main capacity of landscape in realizing participation because the definition of participation is also derived from a people-oriented view. Other landscape capacities include how the audience affects the landscape or how they are affected by the landscape. The audience’s active role in building landscape and the consideration of landscape as a democratic, social, and people-dependent entity are other landscape capacities. They also emphasize the relationship between landscape and the concept of participation. Finally, it can be indicated that if urban projects are built according to the landscape approach, maximum participation will be achievable because they inevitably focus on people’s mentality.  Overall, participation is a concept embedded in landscape.

Keywords

References

Arnstein, Sh. R. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216-224.
Backhaus, A., Fryd, O., Dam, T. (2017). The urban water challenge. In A. van den Brink, D. Bruns, H. Tobi & S. Bell (Eds.). Research in Landscape Architecture Methods and Methodology. London: Routledge.
Berque, A. (2013). Is the word “landscape” changing there? Manzar, 5(23), 25-27.
Buchecker, M., Hunziker, M. & Kienast, F. (2003).Participatory Landscape development: overcoming social barriers to public involvement. Landscape and urban planning, 64, 29-46.
Butler, A. (2014). Developing theory of public involvement in landscape planning: Democratising landscape. Uppsala: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
Bulter, A. & Berglund, U. (2014). Landscape Character Assessment as an approach to understand public interests within the European Landscape Convention. Landscpae research, 3(39), 219-236.
Conrad, E., Cassar, L., Jones, M., Eiter, S., Izaovicova, Z., Barankova, Z., … Fazey, I. (2011). Rhetoric and Reporting of Public Participation in Landscape Policy. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 13(1), 23-47.
Cornwall, A. (2008). Unpacking ‘Participation’: models, meanings and practices. Community Development Journal, 43(3), 269-283.
Egoz, S., Makhzoumi, J. & Pungetti, G. (Eds.). (2011). The right to landscape: Contesting landscape and uuman rights. London: Ashgate.
Habraken, N.J. (1986). Towards a new professional role. Design Studies, 7(3), 139-143.
Ingold, T. (1993). The temporality of the landscape. World archaeology, 25 (2), 152-174.
IAP2. (2007). IAP2 Spectrum of Public Participation. Retrieved 15/06/09, 2018 from www.iap2.org/associations/4748/files/IAP2%20Spectrum_vertical.pdf.
Jones, M. (2007). The European Landscape Convention and the question of public participation.Landscape research, 32(5), 613-633.
Jones, M. (2011). European Landscape and Participation – Rhetoric or Reality? In M. Jones & M. Stenseke (Eds.), The European landscape convention. Dordrecht: Springer.
Jones, M., & Stenseke, M. (2011). The European landscape convention – Challenges of participation. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.
Lawrence, A. (2006). No personal motive? Volunteers, biodiversity, and the false dichotomies of participation. Ethics, Place and Environment, 9(3), 279–298.
Loures, L., Gómez, J.N., Castanho, R. & Loures, A. (2020). Benefits and Limitations of Public Involvement Processes in Landscape Redevelopment Projects—Learning from Practice. In E. Vaz (Ed.). Regional Intelligence Spatial Analysis and Anthropogenic Regional Challenges in the Digital Age. Springer.
Majidi, M. (2020). Participation ratio with satisfaction in Tehran’s pedestrian street’s landscape. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Islamic Azad University, South Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran.
Mansouri, S. A. (2005). An introduction to landscape architecture identification. Bagh-e Nazar, 1(2), 69-78.
Mansouri, S. A. (2014). Achilles heel of landscape architecture in Tehran. Manzar, 5(24), 24.
Mansouri, S. A. & Foroughi, M. (2018). The concept of participation in landscape design. Bagh-e Nazar, 15(62), 17-24.
Olwig, K. R. (2005). The landscape of “customary” law versus that of “natural” law. Landscape Research, 30(3), 299-320.
Olwig, K. R. (2007). The practice of landscape ‘Conventions’ and the just landscape: The case of the European landscape convention. Landscape Research. 32(5), 579 – 594.
Pretty, J.N. (1995). Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture. World Development, 23, 1247–1263.
Reed, M.S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation, 141(10), 2417-2431.
Roe, M. (2013) Policy change and ELC implementation: establishment of a baseline for understanding the impact on UK national policy of the European Landscape Convention. Landscape Research, 38(6), 768-798.
Rowe, G. & Frewer, L.J. (2004). Evaluating Public-Participation Exercises: A Research Agenda. Science, Technology & Human Values, 29(4), 512-556.
Sanoff, H. (2010). Democratic design: Participation case studies in urban and small town environments. Saarbrucken, Germany: VDM.
Schultz, H. & Van Etteger, R. (2017). Walking. In A. van den Brink, D. Bruns, H. Tobi & S. Bell (Eds.). Research in Landscape Architecture Methods and Methodology. London: Routledge.
Smith, B. (2003). Design a Policy Participation Process. In Public Policy and Public Participation Engaging Citizens and Community in the Development of Public Policy. BLSmith Groupwork Inc.
Soltani, L., Farnoosh, F. & Pishro, N. (2015). Sidewalk life sidewalk path of Imam Hossein (AS) to Shohada. Manzar, 7(31), 38-47.
Tress, B. & Tress, G. (2003). Scenario visualisation for participatory landscape planning-a study from Denmark. Landscape and urban planning, 64(3), 161-178.
Wates, N. (2014). The Community Planning Handbook: How People can Shape their Cities Towns and Villages. London: Earthscan.
White, S.C. (1996). Depoliticising development: the uses and abuses of participation. Development in practice, 6(1), 6-15.
Wylie, J. (2013). Landscape and phenomenology. InP. Howard, I. Thompson & E. Waterson (Eds.). The Routledge companion to landscape studies. pp. 54-65. Abingdon: Routledge.
MANZAR, the Scientific Journal of landscape
Volume 13, Issue 54
March 2021
Pages 18-27

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics