The Qualitative Evaluation of Urban Spaces, Application of The Holistic Landscape Approach in the Evaluation of Mashhad Shohada Square Project.

Document Type : Original Research Article

Authors

1 M.A. in Landscape Architecture, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Iran.

2 Visiting Lecturer, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

The organization and renovation of Shohada square in Mashhad, entitled as the urban regeneration project has been in progress for the last two decades and now this project has been almost completed. However, it has failed to achieve its goals as it has witnessed the absence and involvement of people. This failure is caused by the perspective in which urban space is considered merely an object. Previous studies on urban regeneration and related projects show that the focus has just been on the functional and physical aspects of urban spaces rather than meaning. The negligence of the meaning could be the main barrier to developing a sense of place in cities. To address this gap, the current study employed a qualitative and holistic approach to evaluating the Shohada square landscape. The study included three phases: The first phase involved a detailed field study and data collection on the physical attributes, activities, and meaning of space by the researcher. In the second phase, data about Shohada square was collected from available research papers, newspapers, reports,etc.and were further analyzed. Using the content analysis the role of the square was scrutinized from the citizens’ perspectives. To this end, in-depth interviews were conducted with urban users. The findings revealed that the people’s perceptions of Shohada square fall into five categories: “city center”, “shrine threshold”, “public urban space”, “cold and soulless” and “identityless”. These factors reflect the meanings of Shohada square in the citizen’s minds. The study further drew upon the data from three phases to evaluate Shohada square through the lens of its citizens and then attempted to identify the factors threatening the role of this square. Based on the findings, the study concludes that for the revitalization of Shohada Square, three main aims and relatively policies and strategies must be taken into account namely: increasing the space vitality and its transformation to a civil space, reproducing and adding meaning and keeping the identity of space as well as the spatial reorganization of space for bringing people to space. 

Keywords


Bavand, Consulting Engineers' Co-operation Organization in Rahpooyan Planning. (2012). Overview of Shohada Square plan, Hasht Abad and Saheb Azaman axis.
Burke, A. (2009). Landscape, place, date (M. Mansouri, Trans.). Bagh-e Nazar, (9), 81-90.
Canter, D. (1977). The Psychology of Place. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Canter, D. (1988). Action and Place: An Existential Dialectic. Aldershot: Avebury.
Fleick, U. (2018). An Introduction to Qualitative Research (H. Jalili, Trans). Tehran: Ney publications.
 Golkar, K. (2002). Elements of quality design in urban design. Soffeh, 11 (32), 38-65.
Greider, T. & Garkovich L. (1994). Landscapes: the social construction of nature and the environment. Rural Sociology, 59(1), 1-24.
Hsieh, H. F. & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288.
Khostou, M and Sa'idi Razvani, N. (2011). Factors affecting the vitality of urban spaces, the creation of a vibrant urban space, relying on the concept of 'pedestrian shopping mall'. Hoviyat Shahr, 1 (1), 6-74.
Lak, A & Jalalian, S. (2018). The experience of the meaning of urban space location: application of qualitative content analysis to discover the meaning of the Ferdowsi Garden. Motale'at-e Me'mari-ye Iran, 7(13), 71-88.
Madanipour, A. (2001). Tarrahi-ye Faza-ye Shahri, Negareshi bar Farayand-ha-ye Ejtema'i-Makani [Urban Space Design, A perspective on Social-Spatial Process] (F. Mortazai, Trans.). Tehran: Sherkat-e Pardazesh va Barnamerizi-ya Shahri.
Mansouri, M. S. (2016). Aesthetics of collective space; aesthetic evaluation in three urban spaces of Tehran City, MANZAR, 8 (30), 69-62.
Mansouri, S. A & Farzin, A. A. (2017). Rouykard-e Manzarin dar Tarrahi-ye Shahri [A Landscape Approach to City Design]. Tehran: Nazar Institute of Art, Architecture and Urban Planning.
Mansouri, S. M. (2005). A Critique of the urban landscape conference. Bagh-e Nazar, 1(2), 69-78.
Mansouri, S. M. (2011). What is urban landscape? A historical study of the conceptual developments of urban landscape in Iran. MANZAR, (9), 30-33.
Mardani , S. F. (2019). The vitality of communal spaces owes to commercial function. Journal of Art and Civilization of the Orient, 6(20), 13-20.
Mo'ini, S. M. (2012). Walkable Cities. Tehran: Azarakhsh.
Morse, J. M. (1994). Designing Funded Qualitative Research. HANDBOOK OF QUALITATIVE RESEARCH. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Mortaz Mehrabani, El; Mansouri, S. A. & Javadi, Sh. (2018). Landscape approach in the creation of vitality in Vali'asr Street with emphasis on creating sense of place, case study: Vali'asr Street (the area between Vanak Square and Parkway Junction). Bagh-e Nazar, 14 (55), 5-16.
Pakzad, J. (2007). Mabani-ye Nazari va Farayand-e Tarrahi-ye Shahri [Theoretical Framework and Process of Urban Design]. Tehran: Vezarat-e Maskan va Shahrsazi.
Pakzad, J. (2008). Mabani-ye Nazari va Farayand-e Tarrahi-ye Shahri [Theoretical Framework and Process of Urban Design]. Tehran: Shahidi publication.
Relph, E. (1976). Place and Placelessness. London: Pion.
Relph, E. (1997). Sense of Place in Ten Geographical Ideas that Have Changed the World. Rutgers University Press.
Stewart, W. (2008). Place meanings in stories of lived experience. General Technical Report
Stokowski, P. A. (2002). Languages of place and discourses of power: constructing new senses of place. Leisure Research, 34(4), 368-382.
Tuan, Y. (1977). Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.