A Comparative Study of Sima, Manzar, and Chesm Andaz as Persian Equivalents of Landscape in English

Document Type : Original Research Article

Authors

Assistant Professor, School of Architecture, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

With the translation of Kevin Lynch’s book, the “Image of the City”, new literature was added to Iranian architecture and urban planning. In this book, Image, the picture (or perception) of the city was translated to “Sima” regardless of its linguistic roots. With the introduction of the landscape architecture discipline, a new theoretical framework was added to the architecture and urban planning literature. Later, “Chesm Andaz” was also used by some experts as an equivalent for the term “landscape”. The use of these three words interchangeably has caused confusion in the translation of the concept of landscape or narrowed down its real meanings. This comparative study drew upon the European Commission’s definition of landscape to examine the extent to which vocabulary can convey the meaning of landscape in Persian. This study employed library research and lexicographical analysis. The two basic components of the landscape are dependence on the external place and the importance of the human mind and perception in his interactions with the environment. Nazar, in the language of Iranian thinkers, is a dynamic tool used for raising new awareness based on the perception of sensations, and “Manzar” is the name of the place in which this phenomenon occurs. Compared to “Sima,” and “Chesm Andaz”, “Manzar” conveys a more complete sensory perception, and especially compared to “Chesm Andaz”, perception is distant and does not necessarily have a positive attribute. “Manzar” and “Sima” are not synonymous and interchangeable in terms of meaning. “Sima”, in the late meaning, is focused on form and does not express the subjectivity behind the form, therefore it can be considered a landscape form. The observer’s continuous conflict with the form of “Manazar” and is accompanied by its memories implies him from the image to the landscape. Compared to the stability of “Sima” and “Chem Andaz”, the level of the “Manzar” is more compatible with the dynamics of the landscape.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Al-Raghib al-Isfahani, H. B.M. (2008). Almofrdat fi Gharib al-Quran [Vocabulary of Quran (Gh. Khosravi Hosseini, Trans.). Tehran: Al-Muktabeh Al-Mortazawieh Lahiya works of Al-Jaafarieh.
Amid, H. (2015). Amid’s Persian Dictionary. Tehran: Amir Kabir.
Dehkhoda, A.A. (2014). Dehkhoda dictionary. Tehran: University of Tehran.
Dozy, R. (1991). SUPPLÉMENTAUX DICTIONNAIRES ARABES.2VOLS. Leiden: E. J. Brill. Lebanon, Beirut.
Farahidi, A. (1984). ul ‘ayn (M. Makhzoomi & I. Sameriai, Ed.). Qom: Dar Al Hejreh.
Faravashi, B. (2002). Persian Pahlavi dictionary. Tehran: University of Tehran.
Kisai Marvazi. (1994). Diwan of Kisai Marvazi (M.A. Riahi (Ed.)). Tehran: Nashr-e Elmi.
Kasravi, R. & Farzin, A. A. (2015). A research about the word Nazar. Journal of Art and Civilization of the Orient, 4(11), 9-14.
Lynch, K. (2021). The image of the city (M. Mazini, Trans.). Tehran: University of Tehran. [in Persian]
Mansouri, S. & Mokhles, F. (2017). The Spectrum of Landscape Meanings and Its Equivalents in Persian Language. MANZAR, 9(40), 16-21.
Mashkour, M., J. (1967). A Comparative Dictionary Of Arabic, Persian ‭And The Semitic Languages. Tehran: Farhang-e Iran Publications.‬
Mohammadi Asiabadi, A. (2018). In Hafez’s Gaze play. Research in Persian Language and Literature, 3(2), 109-136.
Niyazkar, F. (2010). Nazar bazi-ye Saadi, daghdaghe-ye gonah [Gaze’s Play of Saadi, The Concern of Sin]. Saadi Shenasi, (14), 87-99.
Pakzad, J. (2006). The Image of the City and What Was Perceived By Kevin Lynch. Abadi, 53, 20-26.
Samaei, F. (2003). Makateb-e estelah shenasi va gerayesh-ha-ye farhangestan-e sevom [Schools of Terminology and Tendencies of the Third Academy]. Proceedings of the second seminar on issues in terminology Tehran. Tehran: Persian Language and Literature Academy. 107-89.
Sevenant, M. & Antrop, M. (2009). Cognivive Attributes and Aesthetic Preferences in Assessment and Differenciation of Landscapes. Envinonmental Management, (90), 2889-2899.
Taghavi, S. H. (2013). Landscape Architecture: An Introduction to Definitions and Theoretical Foundations. Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University.
Tusi, F. I. H. (2008). Majma’ al-Bayan fi Tafsir al-Qur’an. Vol. 9. Tehran: Al-Muktaba al-Mortazawiyyah, Lahia al-Aqtar al-Jaafari, Mortazawi.
Word Selection Department of Persian Language and Literature Academy. (2009). Ousoul va zavabet-e vaje gozini hamrah ba sharh va tozihat [The principles and rules of word selection with descriptions and explanations]. Tehran: Academy of Persian Language and Literature.
Yaghma-ye Jandaqi, A.H. (1991). A Collection of Works By Yaghmay Jandaghi (A. Al Dawood (Ed.)). Tehran: Tous.
MANZAR, the Scientific Journal of landscape
Volume 15, Issue 64
October 2023
Pages 54-59

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics